Trump's DEI Cuts Push Davos Elites to Rethink Diversity Language

By Alex Assoune Jan 23, 2025

DAVOS, Switzerland - President Donald Trump's administration has issued several executive orders eliminating federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, prompting a search for new terminology at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

The orders aim to remove what the administration calls discriminatory practices, affecting government hiring and federal contracts by disallowing considerations based on race, sex, or religion. This shift has created a challenge for business leaders at Davos, where traditionally, diversity initiatives have been seen as vital for innovation and business growth.

At the annual meeting in Davos, discussions have turned to how companies can describe their commitment to inclusive practices without using the now politically sensitive terms like "DEI" or "DEIA" (diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility). Leaders from various industries are exploring alternative phrases to convey similar values in a way that aligns with the new administrative directives.

Investment in diversity is not expected to wane, despite the policy changes, according to some bankers present at the forum. They argue that a diverse workforce mirrors the global market and drives innovation. However, not everyone at Davos agrees, with some seeing these moves as a step towards more merit-based systems, potentially at the expense of underrepresented groups.

The Trump administration's directives include putting federal DEI staff on leave and planning for layoffs, signaling a broader push against what they describe as identity-based hiring practices. Critics, including activists, argue that this move might disproportionately benefit those already in advantageous positions, under the guise of prioritizing merit.

As Davos 2025 unfolds, the conversation around diversity continues to evolve, with participants seeking ways to maintain their commitment to inclusivity while navigating the new political landscape. The forum's discussions are a microcosm of a larger debate in the corporate world about how to balance diversity with meritocracy.

Was this article helpful to you? Please tell us what you liked or didn't like in the comments below.

About the Author: Alex Assoune

Alex Assoune (MS) is a global health and environmental advocate. He founded Panaprium to inspire others with conscious living, ethical, and sustainable fashion. Alex has worked in many countries to address social and environmental issues. He speaks three languages and holds two Master of Science degrees in Engineering from SIGMA and IFPEN schools.

What We're Up Against

Multinational corporations overproducing cheap products in the poorest countries.
Huge factories with sweatshop-like conditions underpaying workers.
Media conglomerates promoting unethical, unsustainable products.
Bad actors encouraging overconsumption through oblivious behavior.
- - - -
Thankfully, we've got our supporters, including you.
Panaprium is funded by readers like you who want to join us in our mission to make the world entirely sustainable.

If you can, please support us on a monthly basis. It takes less than a minute to set up, and you will be making a big impact every single month. Thank you.